Technology doesn't support our work as we thought it would...
The VCR Syndrome
Have you ever considered how many people can’t program a VCR?
While we don’t have the actual numbers, we know they’re
large--think of all the jokes!
Can every member of your family program one?
Can any member of your family program one?
TV manufacturers understand this. We recently purchased a TV
which included two remote controls--a TV only and a TV/VCR. We all know the
competitive nature of consumer product sales--manufacturers aren’t doing this
because they enjoy adding to the cost of sales. They understand their buyers.
Realistically programming a VCR is not that complex--you
just need time to practice, the mindset and confidence to work through the
steps, knowledge of the features plus ability to translate them to your specific
needs, and rudimentary programming skills.
You also need a selection (planning) process and time to perform
the actual programming.
The key is remembering why you bought the VCR and having the
will to make it work.
Does simply having a new whiz bang in your home automatically
translate into use?
If implementation and user education was not a deliverable, you
may have the VCR Syndrome in your organization.
Our experience with disappointing technology results is that
a consultant or factory rep comes in--does an explanation, provides some hands
on time and leaves the manual.
The presentation is slick--and used for everyone--not your
organization’s--nor your customers’ needs.
If your users had no representation in buying the
technology--lean staffs may have lead you "not to include the
user"--you have no one who truly understands what this technology can do
and no ownership and will to get it working.
What happens is the equipment slowly gets working on a
basic level, but the real reason you bought it-- sophisticated change
features--never seem to translate into the level of performance or throughput
you expected.
Six Ways to Reduce the VCR Syndrome:
1. Don’t equate technology to a workable system.
If the technology is not applied to your business process, it won’t
serve internal or external customers. If people can’t use the technology,
you’ve got the VCR Syndrome.

2. Don’t confuse potential with performance.
New technology
doesn’t implement itself or necessarily improve speed, reduce cost or
eliminate redundancy. Especially in open systems working out the interfaces,
ensuring data edit points and refining order entry to ensure customers get
what they need, are time and people intensive tasks. Does the system make it
harder or easier to work with external or internal customers. Does it fit your
business process?
3. Define what business objectives you wish to achieve.
Involve the user with what you want to accomplish and listen to their
concerns. You don’t have a system if it is not used or
followed. You have the equivalent of a child playing with a box at Christmas
because he or she can’t understand or is not interested in the toy.
It’s interesting to me that manufacturing organizations are doing everything
they can to reduce or eliminate product warehouses. Whereas, often within
those same organizations simultaneously, computing technology is busily
creating "data warehouses." Going from objectives to functions to
process and then procedures looks easy on paper. Translating it to people is
the hard part
4.
Information
doesn’t mean insight. Are you spending money and resources on
information people don’t use? If so, what’s the point! Critical
information can help you adjust before it’s too late—it has to be used on
a timely basis. A number doesn’t have to be "right." If it’s
gathered and used the same way and people question it,
patterns and associations form—individuals gain insight that has the
potential to be applied in know how. Until people interactively use
technology, you’ve got the VCR Syndrome.
5. Don’t think you can idiot proof the technology. Our
experience with "idiot proofing" systems only creates more
non-thinking idiots. Can your organization compete effectively with idiots?
According to a program sponsored by Andersen Consulting, 18 months is the
amount of time it takes to truly implement, refine and be efficient on a new
system. Even in a "smart organization" having time to learn a new
system is often a luxury. Applying it to be truly useful is several steps
beyond basic learning. How hard is it to enter and extract data? Does entry
fit the way people work? Does it help you run your business?
6. Could innovation other than technology achieve the same results for no
capital investment?
Our experience involving people with
innovation and continuous improvement results in dramatic improvements that
last year after year.
Many factors go into a successful implementation and education
strategy: ownership, time to learn, mindsets of thinking versus doing,
understanding of feature benefits and basic programming and/or user extraction
skills.
Don’t suffer the VCR syndrome. Our proven track record
can help you avoid poor resource allocation choices. Start investing your
resources in performance, not just potential. Don’t tolerate underused
"VCRs" in your workplace!
Who is Janice Scanlan?
Articles Home